How TITC gets used in practice
CEO transitions, diligence and executive build-outs
TITC gets used on CEO succession, board advisory, supervisor-facing appointments, investor diligence and specialist executive build-outs.
Mandate Patterns
Confidential African FinTech mandate patterns
How boards, investors and regulators actually use TITC when leadership quality, governance credibility and regulatory confidence are non-negotiable.
All case studies are anonymised by design.
- Client identities, deal terms and identifying details are withheld
- Patterns, sectors and outcomes are representative of live mandates
- Additional context available under NDA for qualified counterparties
Leadership, governance and execution risk
Decision quality under pressure
Each mandate turns on decision quality, supervisory confidence, investor alignment and management capacity to execute.
Further detail for qualified counterparties
Deeper context under NDA
Additional mandate detail can be shared under NDA with qualified boards, investors, central banks and regulated operators.
Representative mandates
Representative mandates across African financial services
Each mandate pattern below follows the same structure: the leadership problem, how TITC was used, and the outcome unlocked for decision-makers and management teams.
Mandate Pattern 01
CEO transition completed without regulatory disruption
Context
Pan-African payments company active in 6 African markets, backed by a global private equity fund and supervised by multiple central banks.
Leadership problem
The board had to move from a founder-CEO to a successor credible with supervisors. A misstep risked licensing friction, market uncertainty and concern from the sponsor.
What we did
- Mapped CEO-calibre leaders across 3 regions.
- Defined search criteria and a succession plan aligned to sponsor priorities.
- Assessed candidates for supervisory credibility, governance judgement and operating range.
- Advised on sequencing, board messaging and central bank engagement.
Outcome
New CEO appointed within 120 days, licence conditions met, and no disruption to regulatory or capital relationships. The board and sponsor aligned behind a clear governance roadmap.
Mandate Pattern 02
Digital risk leadership appointed under supervisory scrutiny
Context
Tier-1 South African bank with more than 10 million retail customers, mid-digital transformation and under heightened scrutiny on operational and conduct risk.
Leadership problem
Exco needed a digital risk leader who could bridge legacy infrastructure, new FinTech partnerships and rising expectations around AI and cyber risk. A standard risk profile would not be enough.
What we did
- Mapped talent across banks, payment processors and infrastructure providers.
- Tested candidates for supervisory fluency, incident response judgement and board communication.
- Supported engagement with the Prudential Authority around the appointment.
Outcome
Regulators approved the appointment, and digital risk was repositioned as a growth enabler, not a blocker. Exco and the board risk committee worked from a shortlist aligned to supervisory and execution needs.
Mandate Pattern 03
Leadership diligence reshaped investment conditions
Context
Global growth fund evaluating a $50m+ investment in a multi-country African FinTech with rapid growth and complex regulatory exposure.
Leadership problem
The investment committee lacked independent, on-the-ground insight into leadership depth and succession risk across product, risk, compliance and finance. Management presentations alone were not enough.
What we did
- Ran independent leadership due diligence and management interviews.
- Conducted reference work with supervisors, prior investors and board members.
- Mapped bench strength and succession risk against relevant peers.
Outcome
Investment conditions were reset around clear leadership gaps, and a post-investment hiring roadmap was defined. The committee got an independent view of management quality before capital was deployed.
Mandate Pattern 04
Licensing standards grounded in real leadership capacity
Context
African central bank redesigning licensing and fit-and-proper criteria for non-bank FinTech operators in payments and digital credit.
Leadership problem
The central bank needed practical standards for what fit-and-proper leadership looks like in modern FinTech. Policy had to work in licensing decisions, not just on paper.
What we did
- Provided market intelligence on leadership patterns across licensed operators.
- Advised on board and executive role definitions, accountability and decision rights.
- Mapped supervisory expectations against real leadership capacity in market.
- Supported the drafting of guidance for applicants.
Outcome
Updated licensing guidance better reflected both supervisory objectives and market reality. Applicants and supervisors had a clearer roadmap for leadership expectations at licence and renewal stage.
Mandate Pattern 05
Operational governance strengthened through a COO hire
Context
Licensed crypto infrastructure provider handling high daily transaction volumes across multiple African corridors, under heavier scrutiny on AML/CFT controls and resilience.
Leadership problem
The founding team lacked a COO who had run regulated, high-throughput infrastructure. Banking partners and supervisors were pressing for stronger operational governance.
What we did
- Defined the COO mandate around supervisory expectations and bank partner requirements.
- Mapped leaders from exchanges, payment processors and high-volume trading platforms.
- Assessed candidates for incident management, vendor oversight and team-building under strain.
Outcome
Board appointed a COO with regulated payments and trading experience, bank partners extended services, and product expansion was approved. The company also moved to a clearer operating model.
Mandate Pattern 06
CEO succession supported an institutional pivot
Context
African multi-asset trading platform shifting from retail-heavy volumes toward institutional clients, with plans to enter two new jurisdictions.
Leadership problem
The incumbent CEO had entrepreneurial strength but lacked the governance credibility needed for institutional counterparties, supervisors and prospective strategic investors. The transition had to preserve founder value.
What we did
- Defined the next-stage CEO profile with the board.
- Ran a discreet search across banks, brokerages and exchanges.
- Assessed candidates for regulatory track record, P&L ownership and ability to work alongside the founder in a re-scoped role.
Outcome
Board transitioned to a CEO with experience running a regulated trading business. The founder moved into a product and growth role, and the firm advanced institutional relationships and strategic investor discussions.
Mandate Pattern 07
CRO build-out strengthened supervisory credibility
Context
RegTech provider delivering AML/KYC and transaction monitoring tools to banks and FinTechs across several African markets, while featuring in supervisory reviews of client control environments.
Leadership problem
The company needed a Chief Risk Officer to formalise its own risk governance and strengthen credibility with bank clients and supervisors. The gap had become visible.
What we did
- Scoped the CRO mandate across enterprise risk, model governance and supervisory engagement.
- Mapped leaders from banks, consultancies and RegTech businesses with direct supervisory exposure.
- Assessed candidates for FIU and central bank engagement, model validation and board communication.
Outcome
CRO appointed from a Tier-1 bank, and the firm moved to a formal risk framework with stronger documentation. Its credibility improved with both bank clients and supervisory stakeholders.
Mandate Pattern 08
CTO appointment unlocked scale under tighter oversight
Context
Banking-as-a-Service platform providing infrastructure and regulatory cover to multiple FinTech brands, with onboarding demand rising under closer scrutiny from prudential authorities and sponsor banks.
Leadership problem
Founder-led engineering was not enough for the next stage of scale. Sponsor banks wanted clearer accountability and banking-grade resilience before raising limits or approving more partners.
What we did
- Defined a CTO mandate combining cloud-native engineering with regulated banking or payments experience.
- Mapped leaders from banks, core banking providers, processors and large-scale SaaS platforms.
- Assessed candidates for scaling history, incident record, security posture and stakeholder communication.
Outcome
CTO appointed with experience modernising core banking and payment platforms, and the engineering roadmap shifted toward resilience, observability and regulatory reporting. Sponsor banks extended capacity and new partners were onboarded under a stronger governance model.
Confidential by default. Deeper detail under NDA.
Client identities and transaction details remain confidential. Full mandate context, board references and supervisory perspectives are available under NDA for qualified boards, investors and central banks.
Discuss a Comparable Mandate
Use TITC when leadership quality and governance credibility matter
We help boards, investors and regulators frame, stress-test and execute leadership decisions across African financial services.